Again, it’s not saying something negative about Charlie, it is laughing that a guy was assassinated for standing up for what he believed in. How do you still not understand the difference, you don’t have to like him, you don’t have to care that he died, you just shouldn’t laugh at him because that shows a lack of morals. Respectfully, this has nothing to do with constitutional rights. You keep making these childish emotional arguments. Nothing in the constitution says you cant laugh at an assassination. In fact it quite explicitly says you have the freedom of speech to do so. You dont have to like it and it can make you really sad and angry. That has nothing to do with the discussion at hand which about how Americans, including service members, have the freedom to express themselves even if it hurts your feelings. It has ZERO to do with morality. You are the one who doesnt understand what I am saying, or what this discussion is even truly about.