TankieRage
Search
Users
Subreddits
Top 10
X
r/Ghosts:
u/
Seven7greens
I help identify bugs and spiders and my first thought was a beetle crawling across the bulb of the porch light. But rewatching it, the shadow doesn’t make sense… not at all. No legs whatsoever. Just an odd… I wanna say “spectral” mist. Good video here and I see no indication that this is a living creature obstructing the light.
u/
Seven7greens
Have YOU ever seen a naked ghost?
u/
Seven7greens
“AEEEeeee!”
u/
Seven7greens
I did some editing and gotta say, its still creepy as fuck and doesn’t look like a real human. https://imgur.com/a/lZEHO7Y
u/
Seven7greens
Then how is there photographic and video proof/evidence that often correlates ones sightings? We don’t project holograms of what we want to see bo matter how hard we try.
u/
Seven7greens
https://rare.us/rare-news/caught-on-video/legit-ghost-video-nursing-home/
u/
Seven7greens
So what you’re trying to say is that all the “evidence” that is legitimate is faked or one sees it because they want to see it? Not how it works, bud. Experiencing the paranormal more than once is usually what concretes the “belief”, not solely watching videos or reading comments about it. Most non believers of course question themselves, “did i really see that person there or did i imagine it?” “Did that picture fall over, or fly off the shelf?” Tell me how one can project an imagination to the point it is seen by more than one person, or even recorded on video? How is it two people can be recording and capture a third or fourth voice? How about the security guard at the old folks home who saw a ghost with his own eyes which was also captured on camera and he saw it multiple times as well as it being recorded multiple times. But alas, the nonbelievers keep insisting its all faked because they dont want to believe even when they experience it solely because “science doesn’t back it up with empirical evidence. Science doesn’t back a lot up yet things still happen that is unexplainable until it is explained. Para means beside, doesn’t mean it isn’t real. Paramedics, paratroopers, paralegals, paranormal. So “next to normal” is the same as abnormal, and abnormal things happen all the time.
u/
Seven7greens
There is no empirical proof, but there is plenty of evidence in the form of video, photograph, and voice phenomenon. But being that they are largely unrepeatable, that evidence isn’t considered valid. But its there and unexplainable(weeding out the for sure fakes, the questionable fakes, and the like). I know that my ghost experiences are definitely not a product of my own psyche, mainly because how could I describe ghost people I saw when I was a kid that were wearing what they were in the only photograph of them ever taken, and I had never seen said photograph. I couldnt just make it up and I never had been to Oklahoma where the photograph was stored at. They were my great great grandparents from the 1800s and I had never heard of them prior to my sighting. I cant explain it other than ghosts.
u/
Seven7greens
I edited the pic. That is definitely not pareidolia. https://imgur.com/a/AIpTVO8
u/
Seven7greens
I did the best I could to recreate what I saw by using some AI- https://imgur.com/a/O0DV37F
Previous Page
1
2
3
4
Next Page