Everyone does. Anyone who says they dont, is lying or confused. Money is a finite resource. Like any finite resource, it would be really bad if just 1 person had 100% of it and everyone else had no access.  The question now becomes where and how to draw the line. Which is a great question. I dont know how much money is too much money for one person. Should we focus more on capping annual earnings or total accumulated wealth through generations? Successful entrepreneurs should be able to pass their wealth down to their offspring and so on, I believe.  Still, when one person is worth hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars, it gives them unimaginable power and influence. Theres no luxury they cant afford, and still they can easily seek to influence the political and financial landscapes in their favor and against the common peoples. Why should this be allowed and be tolerated? It shouldnt. Im not against people being wealthy and living luxuriously, but be mindful that the more money that is concentrated at the top, the less there is to go around for everyone else and at a certain point the obscene amount of wealth is more that a person could reasonably spend across 10,000 lifetimes, we should question it and be disgusted by it.