Yes, I’m here for rational conversation and debate. However, my disagreement with your logic stems from the fact that the word “overthrow” is an incredibly broad term that has many implications. “Overthrow” can mean change via violence, for sure, but it can also and very legitimately just mean changing the system of power by any number of means. You can “overthrow” a governing system/apparatus via elections, via protests, via incremental reform, via constitutional changes, and yes, via violence.