u/xander707:

Curated Unhinged Comments:

Full Comment Archive:

r/changemyview

It needs to be said that dems respond differently to poor debate performances than republicans do. Trump can just smear shit on the floor and his side will declare him winner. He can tell blatant lies and theyll just ignore it or go along with it. Dems on the other hand actually hold their candidates to certain standards. Dems freaked out because we arent just blind cultists who will follow Biden or whoever the dem nominee is with unwavering, unconditional support. Which is a good thing. Unfortunately, it does mean that dem candidates have to meet a higher standard, and Bidens debate performance didnt meet it. I liked Biden and thought he was a good president, but it was obvious hes just too old. He should never have attempted to run for a second term. He was meant to be a bridge president and thats exactly what he should have stuck to. Obligatory reminder that Trump is also too fucking old. MFer is older than the Transistor ffs.
r/FedJerk

Beyond just hurting people they dont like. If they didnt have double standards theyd have none at all.
r/stockbetz

Politicians is one thing. The director of the FBI has a seemingly important job to be doing constantly and consistently. If you are referring to James Comey, Im pretty sure he wasnt acting FBI director when he went on Colbert. I could be wrong though. Comey may not be as bad as Patel but hes still a shitstain.
r/TheBusinessMix

That isnt how Bribes – I mean donations, work in this country.
r/changemyview

My entire point is simply that neither side says the opposition won a debate. And your entire point is wrong, as has been shown. I offered up a relatively current example of an arguably clear case of a vice presidential candidate winning (or at the very least not coming close to losing) and the majority of Democrats still gave their candidate the win. You dismissed it because you’re “only talking about presidential debates,” but the exact same dynamics are in play and the exact same reasoning applies. Then its irrelevant, because weve already gone over multiple examples of dems acknowledging a loss. If its the exact same reasoning, then Ive already proven my case and demonstrated your position is wrong. For clarity, I was clear in the beginning that both sides have their partisans/loyalists. That will always be true. But my position is its far worse for the republicans, and the reasoning for that is that you will never find a case where a majority of republicans agree that their presidential candidate lost. Meanwhile, you will find cases where democrats do, therefore proving democrats are capable of acknowledging a loss while republicans are not. That doesnt mean that a majority of democrats will always call a debate correctly ,but it does mean republicans will never call a lost debate correctly. I pointed out that even in the Obama versus Romney one you sited earlier, a majority of Democrats believed Obama won. The same source you provided said the following, The vast majority of Republican voters who watched the debate (95%) say that Romney did the better job, and many Democratic voters agree. Democrats are split in their assessment of who did better: 45% say Romney, 44% Obama. So youre wrong. And again I challenge you to find any presidential debate in the last 20 years where republicans even come close to being that split. I doubt youll ever find one where less than 70% believe their candidate won. And I know you will never find one where its less than 50%. You can argue until youre blue in the face, move the goalpost, strawman etc. but what Im telling you is that theres TWO examples in the last 20 years where democrats were able to acknowledge a loss either by majority or plurality. And I further state you will never see that from republicans. Period. And again, republicans are generally bad debaters anyways. Especially where Trump is concerned which covers every dem vs repub debate going back to 2016. But they appeal to a base that doesnt care.
r/world

You have no familiarity with US law or law enforcement procedures. Nice no u defense lmao. lol oh so we can just make stuff up now? They never stated that. lol and lol Plus, were talking about ILLEGAL aliens not US citizens. The same rules do not apply. Oh really? Gee who do we believe? Random fascist shitstain on Reddit or SCOTUS? Keep embarrassing yourself.
r/EconomyCharts

Then you should start correctly assigning the blame for a poorly managed crises by the sitting president that oversaw it.
r/world

Youre suffering from brain rot, as I didnt say anything about warrants but nice copy paste moron. Warrants require prior and subsequent court proceedings. The Trump administration has already admitted they arent doing due process, these people are just being rounded up and shipped out of the country without due process so you are just wasting your breath defending the indefensible. 10 USC 723 doesnt have any exception for risky operations, you are just making shit up like a typical boot licking fascist clown.
r/changemyview

I have never claimed that democrats dont do it. Only that its not even close to equal between the two sides, and I confidently stand by that position.
r/world

The Nazis were also just doing their job, right? Eat a bag of dicks. In this country we have due process, and law enforcement is required to identify themselves per US code 10 USC 723. Trumps administration and ICE are violating the law and real Americans wont stand for it.