r/complaints:

u/xander707

Yet it is the only point you return back to, as if that ever has been my argument No Im pretty sure Ive also gone back to his sexual assault and his belief that he is above the law as well, which you also evidently dont want to discuss. I understand why. Or the bit about sending people who havent been convicted of any crimes to a foreign torture prison outside of US jurisdiction. These things dont make Trump an ass, and your downplaying of the severity of these issues is very telling. And i am no expert on USian law, but your understanding of “Due process” seems to be lacking. It isnt. All peoples, whether citizen or not, are guaranteed due process in the US. Due process is whats necessary to ensure legal residents and US citizens are not mistakenly/illegally deported; that everyone has the right to defend themselves against accusations from the government in a fair manner. That isnt happening under Trump, even though it is the law of the land. Are you aware how many points you have risen, that have literally nothing to do with your statement? What do you mean? I said there was no comparison between both sides. You said I was comparing beliefs vs a persons conduct, which was a fair assessment; so I listed a more comprehensive comparison and now you dont want to talk about any of the comparisons I drew. Finally Ill just clarify that Centrism is a foolish position, for many reasons, but one being because the Overton window is always shifting – in modern times shifting to the right. Which means centrism is shifting to the right. For many issues we face today, there is no middle ground. There is no middle ground position on how many felonies a president should have, or how much sexual assault is acceptable, or how many laws they are allowed to break as president. Hypothetically, If the left says the president should have zero rapes, and the right says 10 rapes is ok, is your centrist position that both sides should compromise on 5 rapes? Thats why you look ridiculous. when two opposite points of view are expressed with equal intensity, the truth does not necessarily lie exactly halfway between them. It is possible for one side to be simply wrong.
u/xander707

I do know neither YOU nor american politics enough to believe all of that claims without research. So i dont care much for that. You dont care to research if the president that is relevant to our discussion was convicted of 34 felonies? Or that he was adjudicated for sexually assaulting a woman? Or has made many verifiable social media posts and has argued directly the Supreme Court that the president must be able to commit any crimes with impunity, up to and including assassinating political opponents, in order to do their job effectively? It would take less than 10 min to verify these claims. Youre obviously not a serious person. Law is changeable. A constitution is changeable. That he wants to change that part does not automatically mean he does that in illegal ways, It is not that he wants to do it, he already has, without changing the law. I dont know if English is your first language or not, but you need to work on your reading comprehension. Trump has already deported people without their constitutionally guaranteed right to due process. He is already publicly threatening US born citizens that disagree with him with stripping their citizenship and deportation. At least i know what i know and what i dont know. You, on the other hand, are cocksure about everything, spouting a lot of random talking points. No, you hide like a coward behind supposedly not knowing something so you dont have to defend what you and I both know is absolutely indefensible. Every claim I have made in this discussion is true and easily verifiable. If you think Trump wasnt convicted of 34 felony counts, say so, and I will happily provide the proof, since its a well documented event. Same with his being adjudicated for sexual assault and ordered to pay tens of millions of dollars to his victim. If Im just in an echo chamber spouting random talking points, this should be no issue for you. Again, you just look ridiculous. You are being told easily verifiable facts about Trump and your only defense is I dont know enough/dont care enough to research it, I dont believe you. You read exactly like the MAGA guys, too ignorant to fact check, or just plain bad faith actor.
u/xander707

Yeah, still too old for Trump though.
u/xander707

Its ok, now you know when you see that term you know its a joke. Derogatory even.
u/xander707

Take a nap, grandma. DemocRAT is 2004 boomer Facebook slang lmao.
u/xander707

lol you hurt some feelings there.
u/xander707

Sure bud, sure. Thanks for the laughs.
u/xander707

Its just not the first time that has happened, though. Check back in maybe 1-2 months from now and I promise they will be back to full-throated support for Trump and will have figured out the common narrative to adopt on how Trump was the hero/victim in this story and the dems, as usual, take full blame. Its inevitable.
u/xander707

They arent pissed because they think Trump is part of it or intentionally covering it up for reasons. They are pissed because Trump isnt capitalizing on the situation to weaponize it and own the libs. They just want Trump to release something that indicts Joe Buden and Barrack HUSSEIN Obamna!
u/xander707

Both sides